翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Leung Kam Fai
・ Leung King Stop
・ Leung Kwan
・ Leung Kwok Wai
・ Leung Kwok-hung
・ Leung Long Chau
・ Leung Man-tao
・ Leung Nok Hang
・ Leung Ping-kwan (Yesi)
・ Leung Po Shan
・ Leung Sheung
・ Leung Sing-Bor
・ Leung Siu-lung
・ Leung So Kee
・ Leung Sui Wing
Leung TC William Roy v Secretary for Justice
・ Leung Ting
・ Leung Tsz Chun
・ Leung Wai-tung
・ Leung Yee-tai
・ Leung Ying
・ Leung Yiu-chung
・ Leungli
・ Leuni
・ Leunisia
・ Leupeptin
・ Leuphana
・ Leupold & Stevens
・ Leupold (surname)
・ Leupoldsdorf


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Leung TC William Roy v Secretary for Justice : ウィキペディア英語版
Leung TC William Roy v Secretary for Justice

''Leung TC William Roy v Secretary for Justice'' ( ) is a leading Hong Kong High Court judicial review case on the equal protection on sexual orientation and the law of standing in Hong Kong. Particularly, the Court sets up a precedent case prohibiting unjustified differential treatments based upon one's sexual orientation.
==Background==
Prior to this case, the age of consent for homosexual men was 21 but not for heterosexual or lesbian couples, which was 16 for them. Any gay men back then having buggery with another man under 21 or being under 21 could be sentenced for life imprisonment, based on the provisions contained in the ''Crimes Ordinance''. In 2004, Mr Leung, the applicant, a 20-year-old gay man, applied for leave for judicial review without being arrested or prosecuted. In his application, Mr Leung complained that the ''Crimes Ordinance'' discriminated against him based upon his sexual orientation and interfered his private life by forbidding him to give physical expression to other gay men and, thus, making him unable to develop long lasting relationships. The consequences were low self-esteem, loneliness, and sense of marginalisation. (Court of First Instance, para. 6)
During the proceedings, Mr Leung challenged four provisions in the ''Crimes Ordinance'' infringing his constitutional rights to equality and privacy. After hearing the oral argument in July 2005, the Court of First Instance of the High Court handed down the judgement a month later. Judge Hartmann ruled in favour of the applicant and struck down all four sections of the ''Crime Ordinance'' violating the guaranteed legal protections for equality and privacy.
Immediately after, the local religious groups gasped and condemned the result and demanded the Government to appeal. In September 2005, the Government declared its plan to appeal. The hearings for appeal were then taken place in July of the following year. On 20 September 2006, the Court of Appeal delivered its judgement and unanimously dismissed the case.〔(Highlights of 2006 and 2007, Department of Justice, Hong Kong )〕 The Government accepted the reasoning and stopped appealing since there.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Leung TC William Roy v Secretary for Justice」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.